In February 2009 Crime Branch of Delhi police
seized 5 leopard skins in Delhi and arrested two persons. On further investigations
with wildlife officials, 3 more leopard skins and traps were seized from
Himachal Pradesh. After the trial a court in Delhi had acquitted both the
accused.
In one of the observation court noted that “More so, as per Manual on
Wildlife Species in Trade, 1st Edition prepared by Wildlife
Crime Control Bureau, Ministry of Environment & Forest, Government of
India, there are procedural guidelines for identifying the wildlife species.
Its Preface specifically provides that the agencies may note that similar and
mere resemblance cannot be taken as confirmatory. Additional test like
morphological, microscopic analytical and forensic tests may have to be
undertaken for legal action. It is further provided in the Manual that for
identifying the skin of leopard, the hair signature pattern of leopard can be
identified if it is having the following pattern: color cremish brown,
culticular scale pattern imbricate, medulla-Continuous, Medullary Index-0.657.
Admittedly, in the present case no such test were conducted by the complainant
and the above mentioned characteristics were also not proved being found on the
recovered skins. The expertise of PW3 in identifying the recovered skins has
not come on record. It is common knowledge that nowadays with the advent of new
technologies fake skins can be prepared with the help of synthetic fibers which
might be having same feel and texture as of a natural skin. In the absence of
chemical analysis/forensic examination of the skins, it cannot be said with
certainty that the recovered skins were of leopard. The complainant has failed
to prove the same.”
No comments:
Post a Comment